← RegalTEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC master · 32 Folien Deutsch English 日本語 فارسی Deck öffnen ↗
SEC-EDGAR · Financial Analysis Pack · v2 template

TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC

TXN
One deck, one template, one scale — from companyfacts, segment XBRL and core metrics.
Data as of2026-03-31 · latest reporting period endSource filed2026-04-24 · latest SEC filingDeck built2026-08-02 · this report runExchange · IndustryNasdaq · Semiconductors & Related DevicesCIK · Fiscal year0000097476 · FY-end 1231
Source: SEC EDGAR companyfacts · all figures provisional (cover build-out: gate 2)
cover · 1 / 32
Cover1 / 32
Contents · what this deck carries and from where · TXN · 32

Table of contents

Ch.SlidePageState
cover1complete
agenda2complete
1Business & segments3complete
Segment mix & profit ladder4complete
Segment walk — two options5complete
Segment contribution walk6complete
Segment walk — walk left, build-up right7complete
2Financial statements8complete
Income statement9complete
Balance sheet10complete
Cash flow11complete
Driver walk — two variants12complete
Driver walk — volume vs margin, margin by driver13complete
Driver walk — bridge over the common-size P&L14complete
Operating walk — three separate analyses15complete
Operating bridge — by driver or by segment16complete
Ch.SlidePageState
Financing & tax — from operating result to the bottom line17complete
3Capital & leverage18complete
Leverage walk — version 1 of 319complete
Leverage & net-debt walk20complete
Leverage walk — version 2 of 321complete
Leverage — the two effects, then nested to source22complete
Leverage — trend and the build-up behind it23complete
Leverage walk — version 3 of 324complete
Leverage — figure, bridge, evidence25complete
Returns on capital — ROE, ROIC and what drives them26complete
Capital returns to shareholders27complete
4Synthesis28complete
Scorecard — six KPIs at a glance29complete
Discussion, findings and sources30complete
Provenance & full concept ledger31complete
End of analysis pack32complete
Generated from the agenda — page numbers and state are measured, not asserted. “partial” = some fields still placeholders, “placeholder” = all fields are.
agenda · 2 / 32
Contents2 / 32
SECTION 1

01
Business & segments
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · div_business
div_business · 3 / 32
div_business3 / 32
Segment profitability · FY2025 · profit pool

Where the profit pool sits — revenue × margin by segment.

Profit pool

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%AnalogEmbeddedProcessingAll Other14.02.717.78.21.2Gross margin (%)Revenue ($bn)59%45%63%1.00.6Ø 57%​ · $bn

Segment reconciliation & profit

SegmentRevenueGross $Gross %EBIT $EBIT %
All Other0.980.6162.8%0.3131.4%
Analog14.018.2458.8%5.4138.6%
Embedded Processing2.701.2345.5%0.3011.3%
Σ Segments17.6810.0857.0%6.0234.1%
Corporate & reconciling0.000.000.00
= Group (consol. P&L)17.6810.0857.0%6.0234.1%

Findings

structure · concentration · cost lever
  • Analog is ~79% of revenue and the bulk of profit — ~59% gross, and it carries almost all of EBIT.
  • Embedded Processing earns a thinner margin; its EBIT contribution is small next to Analog.
  • All Other is a rounding item — and the only place a restructuring charge/(reversal) lands.
  • Read the mekko: one wide, tall blue block. Concentration risk is the story, not diversification.

Apparatus

sources · limitations · provenance · links
Sources

SEC EDGAR companyfacts 10-K (audited) · Segment-XBRL · curated kpi. Every row reconciles to the group.

Limitations

Profit levels by segment: Gross, EBIT. Segment data annual-only (no LTM). 2nd dimension: Region.

Provenance

reported derived (yellow tint).

Related

→ Segment-Walk (who) · → Operating-Bridge (why) · → P&L

chartsmcp stack_mekko (level-switch) · field switches in the panel header · table in flow — expand lengthens the page
segments · 4 / 32
Segments4 / 32
CH 1 · TXN

Segment walk — two options

Two stages for the same verified walk (TXN: 3 segments · Revenue, Gross profit, EBIT · Geographical). Same numbers, same switches — only the arrangement differs.
o1
Option 1 — walk + interpretation
The walk takes 60% of the stage; findings, method and provenance sit on the right. One page, one argument — the switches carry the depth.
b09-60-40
o2
Option 2 — walk left, build-up right
Two equal fields: the walk on the left, the per-segment contribution table on the right. Picture and arithmetic side by side.
b08-halb
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · seg_walk_agenda
seg_walk_agenda · 5 / 32
seg_walk_agenda5 / 32
CH 1 · TXN

Segment contribution walk

Segment walk — who moved the group number

$bn / pp
15.641.850.160.0317.68FY2415.6AnalogEmbed-ded.All OtherFY2517.7

Findings, method and provenance

  • Reading the chart as delivered — Revenue, by segment, vs FY−1: group revenue moved 15.6 → 17.7bn (+2.0bn) between FY24 and FY25. The switches change the view, not these numbers.
  • Analog carried the move: 12.2 → 14.0bn (+1.8bn). Next was Embedded Processing at +0.2bn.
  • Named segments explain +2.0bn of the +2.0bn; the residual -0.0bn is corporate and intersegment eliminations — the walk closes on the reported group figure.
  • Ladder levels this firm actually tags: Revenue, Gross profit, EBIT; a Geographical axis exists but is switched off — not tagged on the revenue concept.

Segment values from the SEC EDGAR segment axis, operating rows only (OperatingSegments preferred over bare members to avoid double-counting; aggregation artifacts skipped). Volume/margin split is order-neutral: vol = ½·Δrev·(m₀+m₁), margin = ½·(r₀+r₁)·Δm. Group anchor from the consolidated P&L (kpi).

TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · segment_walk
segment_walk · 6 / 32
segment_walk6 / 32
CH 1 · TXN

Segment walk — walk left, build-up right

Segment walk — who moved the group number

$bn / pp
15.641.850.160.0317.68FY2415.6AnalogEmbed-ded.All OtherFY2517.7

Segment build-up — Revenue

$bn
$bnFY23FY24FY25ΔAnteil
Analog13.0412.1614.01+1.8579%
Embedded Processing3.372.532.70+0.1615%
All Other1.110.950.98+0.036%
Group (Revenue)17.5215.6417.68+2.04100%
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · segment_walk_v2
segment_walk_v2 · 7 / 32
segment_walk_v27 / 32
SECTION 2

02
Financial statements
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · div_statements
div_statements · 8 / 32
div_statements8 / 32
Statements · income statement · 5 fiscal years & 8 quarters · US GAAPbetterworse

Income statement — the full earnings ladder, collapsible.

Income statement · $mFiscal year · $mQuarter (fiscal) · $m
FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21Q1·26Q4·25Q3·25Q2·25Q1·25Q4·24Q3·24Q2·24
Revenue17,68215,64117,51920,02818,3444,8254,4234,7424,4484,0694,0074,1513,822
Cost of revenue7,5996,5476,5006,2575,9682,0261,9512,0191,8731,7561,6931,6771,611
Gross profit10,0839,09411,01913,77112,3762,7992,4722,7232,5752,3132,3142,4742,211
Gross margin %57.0%58.1%62.9%68.8%67.5%58.0%55.9%57.4%57.9%56.8%57.7%59.6%57.8%
Operating expenses4,0603,6293,6883,6313,4169919991,0601,012989937920963
Research and development2,0831,9591,8631,6701,554510521518527517491492498
R&D % of revenue11.8%12.5%10.6%8.3%8.5%10.6%11.8%10.9%11.8%12.7%12.3%11.9%13.0%
Operating income (EBIT)6,0235,4657,33110,1408,9601,8081,4731,6631,5631,3241,3771,5541,248
Operating margin %34.1%34.9%41.8%50.6%48.8%37.5%33.3%35.1%35.1%32.5%34.4%37.4%32.7%
Other income (expense), net2304964401061434740624880112131130
Income before income taxes5,7105,4537,41810,0328,9191,7141,3721,5841,4781,2761,3591,5541,247
Provision for income taxes7096549081,2831,15016920922018397154192120
Effective tax rate %12.4%12.0%12.2%12.8%12.9%9.9%15.2%13.9%12.4%7.6%11.3%12.4%9.6%
Net income5,0014,7996,5108,7497,7691,5451,1631,3641,2951,1791,2051,3621,127
Net margin %28.3%30.7%37.2%43.7%42.4%32.0%26.3%28.8%29.1%29.0%30.1%32.8%29.5%
Diluted earnings per share ($)5.455.207.079.418.261.681.481.411.281.471.22
Basic earnings per share ($)5.475.247.139.518.381.691.491.421.291.481.23
Revenue FY25
$18bn
latest FY
Operating margin
34%
EBIT / revenue
Net income FY25
$5bn
+4% vs FY21
Latest quarter
$5bn
Q1·26, +19% YoY
SEC EDGAR companyfacts (full) · 5 FY + 8 quarters · $m · bold line = drill · heatmap = Δ (QoQ/YoY), direction-aware · fiscal Q4 derived (FY − 9 mo.); EPS Q4 blank · margins derived.
income_statement · 9 / 32
P&L9 / 32
Statements · balance sheet · 5 fiscal years & 8 quarters · US GAAPbetterworse

Balance sheet — assets, liabilities and equity, collapsible.

Balance sheet · $mFiscal year · $mQuarter (fiscal) · $m
FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21Q1·26Q4·25Q3·25Q2·25Q1·25Q4·24Q3·24Q2·24
Total assets34,58535,50932,34827,20724,67634,39334,58535,00434,93333,75735,50935,32135,048
Total current assets13,75015,02615,12214,02113,68513,79613,75013,87614,48413,08615,02615,87216,789
Cash and equivalents3,2253,2002,9643,0504,6313,5493,2253,3113,0442,7633,2002,5892,740
Short-term investments1,6564,3805,6116,0175,1081,5541,6561,8752,3152,2424,3806,1636,948
Accounts receivable, net1,9631,7191,7871,8951,7012,2451,9632,0621,9341,8601,7191,8621,711
Inventories4,8044,5273,9992,7571,9104,6954,8044,8294,8124,6874,5274,2964,106
Other current assets
Other / unclassified, net2,1021,2007613023351,7532,1021,7992,3791,5341,2009621,284
Total non-current assets20,83520,48317,22613,18610,99120,59720,83521,12820,44920,67120,48319,44918,259
Total liabilities18,31218,60615,45112,63011,34317,61518,31218,37718,53017,35118,60618,05317,834
Total current liabilities3,1593,6433,3202,9852,5693,0963,1593,1182,4922,4893,6433,6863,637
Total non-current liabilities15,15314,96312,1319,6458,77414,51915,15315,25916,03814,86214,96314,36714,197
Stockholders' equity16,27316,90316,89714,57713,33316,77816,27316,62716,40316,40616,90317,26817,214
Common stock and paid-in capital4,5113,9353,3622,9512,6304,7224,5114,4104,2454,0583,9353,8133,666
Retained earnings52,23652,26252,28350,35345,91952,48352,23652,36952,24952,19652,26252,30452,135
Accumulated other comprehensive income-85-140-205-254-157-84-85-149-156-147-140-195-200
Other / unclassified, net-40,389-39,154-38,543-38,473-35,059-40,343-40,389-40,003-39,935-39,701-39,154-38,654-38,387
Total liabilities and equity34,58535,50932,34827,20724,67634,39334,58535,00434,93333,75735,50935,32135,048
Memo — leverage & capital
Total assets FY25
$35bn
latest FY
Total debt
$14bn
gross
Equity ratio
47%
equity / assets
Latest quarter
$34bn
Q1·26
SEC EDGAR companyfacts (full) · point-in-time (instant) · $m · bold line = drill · heatmap = Δ (QoQ/YoY), direction-aware (more debt = worse) · no derivation · ratios derived.
balance_sheet · 10 / 32
BS10 / 32
Statements · cash flow · 5 fiscal years & 8 quarters · US GAAPbetterworse

Cash flow — operating, investing, financing and free cash flow.

Cash flow · $mFiscal year · $mQuarter (fiscal) · $m
FY25FY24FY23FY22FY21Q1·26Q4·25Q3·25Q2·25Q1·25Q4·24Q3·24Q2·24
Net cash from operating activities7,1536,3186,4208,7208,7561,5202,2542,1901,8608491,9981,732
Net income5,0014,7996,5108,7497,7691,5451,1631,3641,2951,1791,2051,362
Depreciation and amortization1,9181,5081,175925897541537497460424416383
Stock-based compensation41938736228923010981931291167887
Deferred income taxes-19-210-299-19115-41153-50-87-21-33
Working capital & other, net-166-166-1,328-1,052-155-67135823326-783320-67
Operating cash flow margin %40.5%40.4%36.6%43.5%47.7%31.5%51.0%46.2%41.8%20.9%49.9%41.7%
Net cash used in investing activities-1,439-3,202-4,362-3,583-4,095-47-676-681-1,3351,253614-487
Capital expenditures-4,550-4,820-5,071-2,797-2,462-676-925-1,197-1,305-1,123-1,192-1,316
Acquisitions, net
Other investing, net3,1111,618709-786-1,633629249516-302,3761,806829
Net cash from financing activities-5,689-2,880-2,144-6,718-3,137-1,149-1,664-1,242-244-2,539-2,001-1,396
Share repurchases-1,477-929-293-3,615-527-158-403-119-302-653-537-318
Dividends paid-4,999-4,795-4,557-4,297-3,886-1,291-1,290-1,236-1,235-1,238-1,240-1,187
Debt repayments, net-750-600-500-500-550-0-0-0-0-750-300-0
Other financing, net1,5373,4443,2061,6941,826300291131,29310276109
Effect of exchange rate & other000000000000
Net change in cash25236-86-1,5811,524324-86267281-437611-151
Free cash flow (OCF − capex)2,6031,4981,3495,9236,2948441,329993555-274806416
Operating cash flow FY25
$7bn
latest FY
Free cash flow FY25
$3bn
OCF − capex
Cash conversion
36%
FCF / OCF
Latest quarter
$2bn
Q1·26
SEC EDGAR companyfacts (full) · 5 FY + 8 quarters · $m · bold line = drill · quarterly flows unwound from year-to-date (YTD n − YTD n−1); fiscal Q4 = FY − 9 mo. · outflows negative · ratios derived.
cash_flow · 11 / 32
CF11 / 32
CH 2 · TXN

Driver walk — two variants

Two stages for the same verified walk (TXN: Gross profit, EBIT, Pre-tax, Net income · 6 FY). Same numbers, same switches — only the arrangement differs.
v1
Variant 1 — bridge + interpretation
The bridge takes 60% of the stage; findings, method and provenance on the right. The switches carry the depth: level, scale, detail, method, window.
b09-60-40
v2
Variant 2 — bridge over the common-size P&L
The bridge as a wide band on top, the growing common-size P&L of both compared years below ($bn, % of revenue, Δpp) — every bar is verifiable in the table.
b-chart-tabelle
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · drv_walk_agenda
drv_walk_agenda · 12 / 32
drv_walk_agenda12 / 32
CH 2 · TXN

Driver walk — volume vs margin, margin by driver

Driver walk — volume, margin and the cost drivers behind it

$bn / pp
5.470.70−0.170.046.02FY24 5.5VolumeCost ofrevenueOperat-ingexpensesFY25 6.0

Findings, method and provenance

  • Reading the chart as delivered — EBIT, by driver, $bn, vs FY−1: ebit moved 5.5 → 6.0bn (+0.6bn) from FY24 to FY25.
  • Split: volume +0.7bn (revenue 15.6 → 17.7bn) against margin -0.1bn (margin 34.9% → 34.1%, -0.9pp) — volume carried it.
  • Margin drivers: Cost of revenue -0.17bn, Operating expenses +0.04bn.
  • Levels available for this firm: Gross profit, EBIT, Pre-tax, Net income. Windows: vs FY−1 … FY−3.

Consolidated P&L from SEC EDGAR companyfacts (annual durations only). Driver contribution of a cost step = −Rev₀·Δ(step/Rev); tagged sub-lines are itemised and reconcile to the step. Volume/margin: margin-first = Δrev·m₁ and r₀·Δm; Shapley = ½·Δrev·(m₀+m₁) and ½·(r₀+r₁)·Δm — both sum exactly to ΔP. In pp scale the volume effect is zero by construction.

TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · driver_walk
driver_walk · 13 / 32
driver_walk13 / 32
CH 2 · TXN

Driver walk — bridge over the common-size P&L

Driver walk — volume, margin and the cost drivers behind it

$bn / pp
5.470.70−0.170.046.02FY24 5.5VolumeCost ofrevenueOperat-ingexpensesFY25 6.0

Common-size P&L — the two compared years

$bn · % of revenue
$bnFY24FY25% rev FY24% rev FY25Δpp
Revenue15.6417.68100.0%100.0%+0.0pp
Cost of revenue6.557.6041.9%43.0%+1.1pp
Gross profit9.0910.0858.1%57.0%-1.1pp
R&D1.962.0812.5%11.8%-0.7pp
G&A / SG&A1.791.8611.5%10.5%-1.0pp
Operating income (EBIT)5.466.0234.9%34.1%-0.9pp
Income tax0.650.714.2%4.0%-0.2pp
Net income4.805.0030.7%28.3%-2.4pp
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · driver_walk_v2
driver_walk_v2 · 14 / 32
driver_walk_v214 / 32
CH 2 · TXN

Operating walk — three separate analyses

Three separate analyses (TXN: Gross profit, EBIT · 6 FY). Every bridge closes exactly on the reported figure; what the firm does not tag is visibly switched off.
1
Operating — the same move, two readings
The bridge to operating profit, switchable between cost drivers and segments. The bracket between driver and segment walk: WHAT moved and WHO moved, one anchor.
b09-60-40
2
Financing & tax — from EBIT to the bottom line
Non-operating result, then tax separated into the rate effect and the higher-base effect — together they equal the tax change exactly.
b09-60-40
3
Exceptionals — reported versus adjusted
Restructuring, impairments, disposals, acquisition costs — only what the firm actually tags. Nothing tagged is a finding too.
b09-60-40
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · op_walk_agenda
op_walk_agenda · 15 / 32
op_walk_agenda15 / 32
CH 2 · TXN

Operating bridge — by driver or by segment

Operating bridge — the same move, by driver or by segment

$bn
5.470.70−0.170.046.02FY24 5.5VolumeCost ofrevenueOperat-ingexpensesFY25 6.0

Findings, method and provenance

  • Operating. EBIT 5.5 → 6.0bn (+0.6bn). The same move reads two ways — by cost driver or by segment; both anchor on the reported group figure.
  • Financing & tax. Net income 4.8 → 5.0bn. Effective tax rate 12.0% → 12.4% (+0.4pp): rate effect -0.0bn, tax on the higher base -0.0bn — it was mostly the bigger base.
  • Exceptionals. Restructuring 0.12bn, Goodwill impairment 0.03bn, Gain/(loss) on disposal -0.00bn — adjusting them out moves the operating result by +0.2bn.

Consolidated P&L from SEC EDGAR companyfacts; segment view from the segment axis (operating rows only). Tax is split rate-versus-base: rate effect = −EBT₁·Δr, base effect = −ΔEBT·r₀ — together they equal the total tax change exactly. Exceptionals cover restructuring, goodwill and asset impairment, disposal gains/losses and acquisition costs, each only where the firm tags it.

TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · operating_bridge_slide
operating_bridge_slide · 16 / 32
operating_bridge_slide16 / 32
CH 2 · TXN

Financing & tax — from operating result to the bottom line

Financing & tax — from operating result to the bottom line

$bn
4.800.56−0.30−0.02−0.035.00Net FY244.8Operat-ing(ΔEBIT)Non-op-eratingTax rateTax onhigherbaseNet FY255.0

Exceptionals — reported versus adjusted

$bn
6.020.120.030.006.17EBITreported6.0Restruc-turingGoodwillimpair-mentGain/(loss)ondisposaladjusted6.2
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · fintax_slide
fintax_slide · 17 / 32
fintax_slide17 / 32
SECTION 3

03
Capital & leverage
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · div_capital
div_capital · 18 / 32
div_capital18 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Leverage walk — version 1 of 3

Three layouts of the same verified analysis (TXN, net-debt walk). Same numbers, same Shapley split — only the staging differs. Pick one; the others get removed.
V1
Version 1 — quad
Four equal panels: two-effect bridge · leverage trend · debt vs earnings · findings. Everything on one page; each panel gets a quarter of the stage.
b11-quad
V2
Version 2 — max two charts per slide
Two pages, never more than two charts each. Page one pairs the two-effect bridge with the nested bridge at full size; page two puts the trend beside the growing build-up table.
b08-halb + b-chart-tabelle-paar
V3
Version 3 — figure, bridge, evidence
One page, read top-down: the four numbers first, the nested bridge as a wide band, then the build-up table growing underneath as the proof.
b-kpi-chart-tabelle
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · lev_v1_agenda
lev_v1_agenda · 19 / 32
lev_v1_agenda19 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Leverage & net-debt walk

Net debt / EBITDA — two effects

×
1.4910.058−0.1851.363FY241.49×Δ NetdebtΔEBITDAFY251.36×

Leverage trend — net vs gross

× EBITDA
0.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25NetGross0.561.030.320.800.510.790.971.321.491.951.361.77

The two factories: debt stock and earnings flow

$bn
3456789101112FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25Net debtEBITDA3.76.63.19.75.711.18.38.510.47.010.87.9

Findings, method and provenance

  • Leverage moved down from 1.49× to 1.36× (FY24 → FY25).
  • Split, order-neutral: debt effect +0.06×, EBITDA effect -0.19× — the earnings flow did the heavier lifting.
  • Net debt 10.8bn against EBITDA 7.9bn; cash 3.2bn offsets gross debt 14.0bn.
  • On a trailing-twelve-month basis the ratio reads 1.23× at 2026-03-31 — quarterly components are unwound from year-to-date filings (Q2 = H1 − Q1, Q3 = 9M − H1, Q4 = FY − 9M); every four-quarter sum ties to the reported fiscal year.

Two-factor Shapley decomposition (order-neutral): debt effect = ½·(ND₁−ND₀)·(1/E₀+1/E₁), EBITDA effect = ½·(ND₀+ND₁)·(1/E₁−1/E₀). Source: SEC EDGAR companyfacts, fiscal-year-end instants and full-year flows.

TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · leverage_walk
leverage_walk · 20 / 32
leverage_walk20 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Leverage walk — version 2 of 3

Three layouts of the same verified analysis (TXN, net-debt walk). Same numbers, same Shapley split — only the staging differs. Pick one; the others get removed.
V1
Version 1 — quad
Four equal panels: two-effect bridge · leverage trend · debt vs earnings · findings. Everything on one page; each panel gets a quarter of the stage.
b11-quad
V2
Version 2 — max two charts per slide
Two pages, never more than two charts each. Page one pairs the two-effect bridge with the nested bridge at full size; page two puts the trend beside the growing build-up table.
b08-halb + b-chart-tabelle-paar
V3
Version 3 — figure, bridge, evidence
One page, read top-down: the four numbers first, the nested bridge as a wide band, then the build-up table growing underneath as the proof.
b-kpi-chart-tabelle
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · lev_v2_agenda
lev_v2_agenda · 21 / 32
lev_v2_agenda21 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Leverage — the two effects, then nested to source

Net debt / EBITDA — two effects

×
1.4910.058−0.1851.363FY241.49×Δ NetdebtΔEBITDAFY251.36×

Net debt / EBITDA — nested to source

×
1.491−0.9630.6130.6730.199−0.464−0.1760.034−0.007−0.0361.363FY241.49×Op. cashflowCapexDiv-idendsBuy-backsOther(FX/leas-es/M&A)VolumeCost ofrevenueOperat-ingexpensesD&Aadd-backFY251.36×
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · leverage_walk_v2a
leverage_walk_v2a · 22 / 32
leverage_walk_v2a22 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Leverage — trend and the build-up behind it

Leverage trend — net vs gross

× EBITDA
0.20.40.60.81.01.21.41.61.82.0FY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25NetGross0.561.030.320.800.510.790.971.321.491.951.361.77

Build-up — debt, cash, earnings

$bn
$bnFY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Gross debt6.87.78.711.213.614.0
− Cash and equivalents3.14.63.03.03.23.2
= Net debt3.73.15.78.310.410.8
EBITDA6.69.711.18.57.07.9
Net debt / EBITDA0.56×0.32×0.51×0.97×1.49×1.36×
Gross debt / EBITDA1.03×0.80×0.79×1.32×1.95×1.77×
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · leverage_walk_v2b
leverage_walk_v2b · 23 / 32
leverage_walk_v2b23 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Leverage walk — version 3 of 3

Three layouts of the same verified analysis (TXN, net-debt walk). Same numbers, same Shapley split — only the staging differs. Pick one; the others get removed.
V1
Version 1 — quad
Four equal panels: two-effect bridge · leverage trend · debt vs earnings · findings. Everything on one page; each panel gets a quarter of the stage.
b11-quad
V2
Version 2 — max two charts per slide
Two pages, never more than two charts each. Page one pairs the two-effect bridge with the nested bridge at full size; page two puts the trend beside the growing build-up table.
b08-halb + b-chart-tabelle-paar
V3
Version 3 — figure, bridge, evidence
One page, read top-down: the four numbers first, the nested bridge as a wide band, then the build-up table growing underneath as the proof.
b-kpi-chart-tabelle
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · lev_v3_agenda
lev_v3_agenda · 24 / 32
lev_v3_agenda24 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Leverage — figure, bridge, evidence

Net debt
$10.8bn
FY25
EBITDA
$7.9bn
trailing FY
Leverage
1.36×
net debt / EBITDA
Change
-0.13×
vs FY24

Net debt / EBITDA — nested to source

×
1.491−0.9630.6130.6730.199−0.464−0.1760.034−0.007−0.0361.363FY241.49×Op. cashflowCapexDiv-idendsBuy-backsOther(FX/leas-es/M&A)VolumeCost ofrevenueOperat-ingexpensesD&Aadd-backFY251.36×

Build-up — debt, cash, earnings

$bn
$bnFY20FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25
Gross debt6.87.78.711.213.614.0
− Cash and equivalents3.14.63.03.03.23.2
= Net debt3.73.15.78.310.410.8
EBITDA6.69.711.18.57.07.9
Net debt / EBITDA0.56×0.32×0.51×0.97×1.49×1.36×
Gross debt / EBITDA1.03×0.80×0.79×1.32×1.95×1.77×
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · leverage_walk_v3
leverage_walk_v3 · 25 / 32
leverage_walk_v325 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Returns on capital — ROE, ROIC and what drives them

Returns — ROE, ROIC, ROA and what drives them

%
2530354045505560FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25ROE58.360.038.528.430.7

Findings, method and provenance

  • Return on equity 30.7% (+2.3pp vs FY24).
  • DuPont. asset turnover +4.4pp, margin -2.4pp, equity multiplier +0.3pp — asset turnover did the most work. Margin 30.7% → 28.3%, turnover 0.44 → 0.51×, multiplier 2.10 → 2.13×.
  • ROIC 19.5% — NOPAT (EBIT at the effective tax rate) over equity plus debt less cash; the measure that ignores how the mix is financed.
  • Capital returned 6.48bn (buybacks 1.48, dividends 5.00) against free cash flow 2.60bn — 249% of it.

All inputs from the same statement layer as the P&L, balance sheet and cash-flow slides. ROE = net income / equity · ROA = net income / assets · ROIC = EBIT·(1 − effective tax rate) / (equity + debt − cash). DuPont splits ΔROE into margin × asset turnover × equity multiplier using the order-neutral Shapley decomposition for a three-factor product — the three contributions sum to the ROE change exactly.

TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · returns_slide
returns_slide · 26 / 32
returns_slide26 / 32
CH 3 · TXN

Capital returns to shareholders

Returns — ROE, ROIC, ROA and what drives them

%
2530354045505560FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25ROE58.360.038.528.430.7

Capital returns — buybacks, dividends and what funds them

$bn / %
0.533.896.293.624.305.920.294.561.350.934.791.501.485.002.60FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25BuybacksDividendsFree cash flow
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · capital_returns
capital_returns · 27 / 32
capital_returns27 / 32
SECTION 4

04
Synthesis
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · div_synthesis
div_synthesis · 28 / 32
div_synthesis28 / 32
CH 4 · TXN

Scorecard — six KPIs at a glance

Revenue growth

% YoY
13.0%+23.8pp vs FY24
−15−10−5051015FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25Revenuegrowth9.2−12.5−10.713.0

Operating margin

EBIT / revenue
34.1%-0.9pp vs FY24
34363840424446485052FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25Operatingmargin48.850.641.834.934.1

ROIC

NOPAT / invested capital
19.5%+1.9pp vs FY24
1520253035404550FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25ROIC47.543.625.617.619.5

Free cash flow

OCF − capex
2.60bn+1.11bn vs FY24
123456FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25Free cashflow6.295.921.351.502.60

Cash conversion

FCF / OCF
36%+13pp vs FY24
203040506070FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25Cashconversion7268212436

Payout of FCF

buybacks + dividends
249%-133pp vs FY24
50100150200250300350400FY21FY22FY23FY24FY25Payout ofFCF70134360382249
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · scorecard
scorecard · 29 / 32
scorecard29 / 32
CH 4 · TXN

Discussion, findings and sources

Discussion — what this deck says in four sentences

  • Size and direction. Revenue FY25 17.7bn (+13% vs FY24), net income 5.0bn.
  • Who moved it. 3 segments; the swing came from Analog at +1.8bn of a +2.0bn group change.
  • What moved it. EBIT 5.5 → 6.0bn: volume +0.7, margin -0.1bn (34.9% → 34.1%) — volume carried it.
  • How it is funded. Net debt 10.8bn against EBITDA 7.9bn = 1.36× (prior year 1.49×).

Sources & limitations — including what does not work

Sources
  • SEC EDGAR companyfacts, fully loaded (extend_facts) into p1_TXN.sqlite; annual and quarterly durations separated by period length; segment values from the segment axis.
  • Charts throughout via chartsmcp (never hand-written SVG); slot size = viewBox ÷ k so labels land at 11 px in the deck.
Limitations
  • Statements: 5 fiscal years + 8 quarters. Quarterly values unwound from year-to-date filings (Q2 = H1 − Q1 …); fiscal Q4 is derived, EPS Q4 left blank (not additive).
  • Segments: this firm tags the levels Revenue, Gross profit, EBIT — the filing carries no more; untagged levels are never estimated.
  • Second dimension (Geographical) is switched off: not tagged on the revenue concept.
  • LTM series: quarterly EBITDA from unwound quarters; every four-quarter sum ties to the reported fiscal year.
  • Not included: market data (price, multiples) and macro series — neither is in companyfacts; including them would mean inventing content.
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · findings
findings · 30 / 32
findings30 / 32
CH 4 · TXN

Provenance & full concept ledger

Concept ledger — from a deck line back to the filing

us-gaap
Lineresolved us-gaap tagfactsstaterest of the chain
revRevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax60resolvedRevenues, RevenueFromContractWithCustomerIncludingAssessedTax
cogsCostOfGoodsAndServicesSold47resolvedCostOfRevenue, CostOfGoodsSold
grossGrossProfit117resolved
rndResearchAndDevelopmentExpense109resolved
smnot taggedSellingAndMarketingExpense, MarketingExpense
ganot taggedGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense
sgaSellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense109resolved
opexnot taggedOperatingExpenses, CostsAndExpenses
ebitOperatingIncomeLoss117resolved
otherOtherNonoperatingIncomeExpense109resolvedNonoperatingIncomeExpense
pretaxIncomeLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeIncomeTaxesExtraordinaryItemsNoncontrollingInterest83resolvedIncomeLossFromContinuingOperationsBeforeIncomeTaxesMinorityInterestAndIncomeLossFromEquityMethodInvestments
taxIncomeTaxExpenseBenefit109resolved
netNetIncomeLoss113resolvedProfitLoss
epsdEarningsPerShareDiluted117resolved
epsbEarningsPerShareBasic117resolved

Loaded: 13,040 facts across 514 concepts for CIK 0000097476. The chain is tried in order; the first tag with a value for 2025-12-31 wins — that is how one report stays readable across firms that report the same measure under different tags.

TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · provenance
provenance · 31 / 32
provenance31 / 32
TXN

End of analysis pack

End of analysis pack
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts
TXN · SEC EDGAR companyfacts · dummy-master · closing
closing · 32 / 32
closing32 / 32